"There are things about yourself that you are ashamed of or
afraid of, but you don’t let the other person see your flaws. And, of course,
you cannot show your partner those parts of your character that you cannot see
yourself and which will only be revealed to you in the course of the marriage.
There is an emotional 'high' that comes to us when someone thinks we are so
wonderful and beautiful, and that is part of what fuels the early passion and
electricity of falling in love. But the problem is-and you may be
semiconsciously aware of this-the person doesn’t really know you and therefore
doesn’t really love you, not yet at least. What you think of as being head over
heels in love is in large part a gust of ego gratification, but it’s nothing
like the profound satisfaction of being known and loved." - Tim Keller
The lovely Tim Keller, the author of the book the Meaning of Marriage which I have been reading, has a whole chapter called "Loving the Stranger," - the premise of which is that you are essentially committing your life to a stranger when you agree to marriage. He says that throughout the course of his marriage, his wife has been married to five different men, while married to him. This thought is echoed by our marriage counselor, Pastor Kyu, who reiterates that there are so many things you learn about each other in a marriage that you didn't know before. My Dad always says that him and my Mom are completely different people than they were when they were only 21 and saying "I Do."
Yeah, I've heard this, but honestly its hard for me to believe!!! I mean, I've been dating Richard for 4 and a half years now, how much more can there be to know? I know that is naive of me to say, but when I try to think about who Richard is, I feel like I have a grasp on him, you know? I mean, I spend most of my time with him, we talk so openly with each other, I have seen many ugly sides of him, and still I have agreed to love him. In the best possible way - I feel like the mystery has evaporated.
When people ask me why I'm marrying Richard, my obvious answer is, I love him!!! We love each other. We are in love with each other and we love each other.
This is why Keller's quote is so unsettling. It unabashedly claims that despite how strongly I may feel that I know Richard as well as I ever will, I do not. It states boldly that there are parts of me, of my own personality, that I still do not know about and will only surface in marriage. Untapped parts of each other just waiting to be discovered. And that's not including things that we still hide from each other because we can, because we still have enough distance between us to be better versions of our raw, unmasked selves.
Keller argues that when I say "I love Richard," the origins of that passion are not the same thing as honest love. And that challenges me a lot! I do think that I genuinely love Richard, and I will not even think otherwise, but Keller is questioning my motives here!
He is saying that a lot of my feelings of mushy gushy love are actually an emotional high that I am feeling because Richard thinks I'm great. Part of falling in love and being in love is finding the other person irresistible - seeing all these great things in someone else and acknowledging the other person as the center of your world. The other part is the amazing gratification felt when someone looks at you as the center of their's.
This may seem trivial, but it really isn't. I LOVE that Richard loves me. Every time Richard tells me how lucky he is to have me, I feel great about myself. Every time he is attracted to me, I feel incredible. Every time he says how much he loves me or does romantic things for me or sends me sweet text messages, I am feeling like a million bucks, you know? It is like an electric charge, a craving for attention, praise, flattery.
Falling in love is really like having a gratified ego. Richard gives me a sense of fulfillment, makes me feel important and special, recognizes things about me that I like being recognized. I love being loved. There is passion in being wanted in that way.
But is that love? That is flattery, romance, and a lot of fun, but is it love?
I think Keller is trying to say is that this is an element of falling in love, but it is not the substance of it. Mostly because this sort of love is focused on ME. On what Richard has to offer ME. How Richard makes ME feel - and visa versa too. We are feeding off of this mutual attraction, and feel a high off of the power of the way we are making each other feel.
When I read this quote, I immediately identified with it. I know what Keller is saying here, because I do love being in love with Richard. I love when we spend time together just us two and I feel like we are the only two people in the world and I can be free and uninhibited. I love the fact that I can just relax with him and not have to try to impress him, and that he just accepts me as I am. I love that he takes care of me, and that my family and friends love him. I love having person to talk to, vent to at a moments notice.
And all of these things are me focused. When I am honest with myself, I must admit that Richard does gratify my ego. He makes me feel great about myself! I feel fulfilled when I'm with him, he supports and encourages me and that is how I want to feel for the rest of my life!!!
Is this the right foundation for marriage? To be with someone who makes me feel loved? Is feeling loved and actually loving someone for who they are the same thing? Do I love Richard for the man he is, or for the woman he makes me feel I am?
Motives are the key to this question. I find that Christianity is a lot about motives. I always think that God cares more about WHY we do the things we do, rather than what we are actually doing. I think that God wants us to do things with a selfless, humble heart. Doing something great without having the appropriate spirit inside of you devalues it, because your heart was not in the right place. The Bible says that the greatest commandments are to love Him and love others, and if our motives do not align with this way of life, then we are always trying to do good things to please ourselves.
Why am I getting married? My immediate answer is to think about how Richard makes ME feel. That is not true love, because more than anything it is self focused. Love is about focusing on the other, making yourself less, seeing the other's happiness as greater than your own.
I am not trying to say that I don't love Richard as a man. He is incredible and there are so many amazing things about him that I admire. I am only trying to emphasize that my instinct is not to think about the other. It is to think about myself.
This breakdown in the way that I think about love has made me really think through what I am expecting to get out of marriage, you know? I am starting to learn that the purpose of marriage is not self-actualization but instead living a life trying to know and love your partner to the best of your ability. Seems like an obvious statement, but it really is a huge shift of focus for me. Shifting from the head-over-heels feeling to understanding that Richard and I really will be spending a lot of time getting to know each other once we sober up from being "in love." That should be the focus of our marriage, understanding and learning each other, focusing on the other, letting go of the need to be constantly fulfilled by the other.
I have been thinking and praying that God would allow me to see the real purpose of marriage. That I would not be getting married for MYSELF, but so that I would live a life learning Richard and doing my best to love him in a real, honest way.
I love Keller's last line about the "profound satisfaction of being known and loved." That is so much more meaningful, so much more grounded and beautiful than the in love experience. It is the love you feel once you focus on the other, begin building a life where you are committed to loving the other. Being known and loved, that is the dream, that is what I want to strive for. More on that later :)